Publication Date
In 2025 | 5 |
Since 2024 | 18 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 71 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 108 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 144 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Postsecondary Education | 146 |
Higher Education | 144 |
Secondary Education | 7 |
Elementary Education | 3 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Two Year Colleges | 2 |
Adult Education | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Teachers | 1 |
Location
China | 16 |
Japan | 10 |
Saudi Arabia | 10 |
Turkey | 8 |
Iran | 7 |
Taiwan | 7 |
Indonesia | 6 |
South Korea | 6 |
Thailand | 6 |
Canada | 5 |
Malaysia | 3 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Test of English as a Foreign… | 5 |
Test of English for… | 3 |
International English… | 2 |
Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jayne E. O. Stone – Composition Forum, 2024
In this article, I argue for centralizing revision in FYC classrooms, thereby establishing it as the vital component of composition that it is. I show that engagement with revision in FYC courses tends to be minimal, relegated to the end of a project, or completely omitted. These low standards for revision pedagogy can result in students not…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, College Faculty, Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction
Christina Torres; Elif Saribas – Higher Learning Research Communications, 2024
Objectives: The purpose of the study was to investigate how tutors approached second language (L2) errors when working with advanced graduate students in structured one-on-one feedback sessions. Method: The longitudinal, qualitative case study used data from immediate, retrospective tutor reflections and in-session interactions to follow two…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Writing Instruction, Feedback (Response), Advanced Students
Haiyang Sun; Mingchao Wang – Language Teaching Research, 2025
Peer feedback has been widely used in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing classes, but its effect is highly variable and its quality and validity are often questioned by students as well as teachers. This research aims to explore the effects of teacher intervention on student use of different types of peer feedback and on their…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Writing Instruction, Peer Evaluation
Derek Hopper; Neil Bowen – rEFLections, 2023
Many writing teachers believe that giving written corrective feedback (WCF) is an important part of learning to write. Equally, students like to receive it. However, most previous research on WCF has looked at its overall effectiveness, with less attention paid to the differences of opinion between students and their teachers, and the implications…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes, Feedback (Response), Writing Instruction
Bei Cai; Ziyu He; Hong Fu; Yang Zheng; Yanjie Song – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2025
Much research has applied automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems to English writing instruction; however, understanding how students internalize and apply this feedback to reduce writing errors is difficult, largely due to the personal and private nature of this process. Therefore, this research utilized eye-tracking technology to explore the…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Majors (Students), Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation
Nipaspong, Pajaree – PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 2022
This study aimed to determine how teachers' online written corrective feedback (WCF) affected university students' self-regulation in writing and how the effects differed among students of different English proficiency levels. The participants were 27 second-year university students enrolled in a required online writing course. Throughout the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), College Students, Electronic Learning, Written Language
Effects of Explicit Written Corrective Feedback on Subject-Verb Agreement among Kurdish EFL Students
Mahmood, Rizgar Qasim; Aziz, Muhammad Abdulwahab – Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 2023
The research on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing has garnered considerable attention over the years, particularly concerning the impact of corrective feedback (CF) on students' errors. However, in the context of Kurdish EFL students, this area of research has received limited attention, despite its potential to enhance their grammatical…
Descriptors: Direct Instruction, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Grant Eckstein; Ying Suet Michelle Lung; Natasha Gillette – TESL-EJ, 2025
Students are often encouraged to proofread their writing by reading it aloud. Presumably, this will allow writers to correct local errors. Yet even though this strategy may be effective for native speakers, there is little empirical evidence of its benefit among second language writers. Therefore, we wondered how many errors second language…
Descriptors: Proofreading, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Nato Pachuashvili – IAFOR Journal of Education, 2024
Giving feedback has always been the backbone of the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing class. Written corrective feedback focuses on responding to students' written work by extensively correcting their errors or offering constructive suggestions for improvements. The process of digitalization of education offered an alternative to…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Writing Instruction
Attila M. Wind – Journal of Response to Writing, 2024
The positive effects of dynamic written corrective feedback (DWCF) on linguistic accuracy are well-documented (Evans et al., 2010). However, studies on DWCF without exception have adopted a pretest--posttest research design; therefore, they were unable to explore the dynamics of development (Larsen-Freeman, 2006). In addition, all previous DWCF…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Written Language, Undergraduate Students, Essays
Barrot, Jessie S. – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2023
Despite the building up of research on the adoption of automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems, the differential effects of automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) on errors with different severity levels and gains across writing tasks remain unclear. Thus, this study fills in the vacuum by examining how AWCF through Grammarly affects…
Descriptors: Automation, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Khadawardi, Hanadi Abdulrahman – English Language Teaching, 2021
Debate about the value and the effect of both kinds of corrective feedback, explicit and implicit on second language writing has been prominent in recent years. Second language writing researchers investigate whether written implicit corrective feedback facilitates the acquisition of linguistic features. In contrast, L2 writing researchers…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Yoshimasa Ogawa – Journal of Response to Writing, 2025
This study explored a way to help Japanese university students write longer essays while maintaining grammatical accuracy. Participants were three groups of students enrolled in a one-year EFL course in different academic years (N = 111), and the number of words they wrote in 30 minutes and the number of errors made per 100 words were compared. To…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Accuracy, Writing Evaluation
Eun Young Kang – Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2024
This quasi-experimental study investigated the effect of using model texts as a written corrective feedback (WCF) strategy on second language learners' writing, in both rewritten drafts and new drafts. It further examined learners' perceptions of model-based feedback and how those perceptions affected model effectiveness. Sixty-six English…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Feedback (Response)
Solmaz, Fatma; Tas, Songül; Kalin, Imran Mollaoglu – Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 2023
Written corrective feedback (WCF) is widely implemented in EFL writing classrooms; however, there is not consensus on how and to what extent it should be used. The controversial findings of the WCF studies reflected in teaching practices and perceptions of the practitioners on WCF, and many studies reported that there was an inconsistency between…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Written Language, Teacher Attitudes