Publication Date
In 2025 | 7 |
Since 2024 | 39 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 161 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 285 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 386 |
Descriptor
Error Correction | 389 |
Second Language Learning | 389 |
Second Language Instruction | 313 |
English (Second Language) | 301 |
Foreign Countries | 283 |
Feedback (Response) | 272 |
Teaching Methods | 212 |
College Students | 168 |
Student Attitudes | 135 |
Grammar | 132 |
Undergraduate Students | 119 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Kartchava, Eva | 5 |
Al-Jarf, Reima | 4 |
Kim, YouJin | 4 |
Ammar, Ahlem | 3 |
Barrot, Jessie S. | 3 |
Ellis, Rod | 3 |
Kim, Ji Hyun | 3 |
Li, Shaofeng | 3 |
Loewen, Shawn | 3 |
Nakatsukasa, Kimi | 3 |
Ranalli, Jim | 3 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Teachers | 3 |
Location
China | 45 |
Turkey | 29 |
South Korea | 20 |
Iran | 18 |
Japan | 15 |
Taiwan | 15 |
Saudi Arabia | 14 |
Thailand | 14 |
Spain | 13 |
Canada | 9 |
Indonesia | 9 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Simon Mlundi – Anatolian Journal of Education, 2024
Writing skills are the most difficult language skills for students, especially those students with English as a Second Language (ESL) and as an English Foreign Language (EFL) in various academic institutions. This situation has made most college students fail to write effective academic works. This study assessed the effectiveness of the Editing…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Law Students, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Khaled ElEbyary; Ramy Shabara; Deena Boraie – Language Testing in Asia, 2024
Despite the plethora of studies on the role of noticing in second language learning, little is known about the role of AI-operated feedback in noticing errors and uptake "during" and "after" writing. To address this gap, this study primarily aimed to investigate the impact of feedback modes and timing on L2 students' noticing…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Artificial Intelligence, Second Language Learning, English (Second Language)
Samuel S. Davidson – ProQuest LLC, 2024
Automated corrective feedback (ACF), in which a computer system helps language learners identify and correct errors in their writing or speech, is considered an important tool for language instruction by many researchers. Such systems allow learners to correct their own mistakes, thereby reducing teacher workload and potentially preventing issues…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Automation, Student Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Lieselotte Sippel – Language Teaching Research, 2024
This classroom study investigated the effectiveness of form-focused instruction and peer feedback training to improve grammatical accuracy and thereby maximize learning opportunities during peer interaction. Eighty-seven third-semester learners of German were assigned to a PI group (peer interaction only), an FFI group (peer interaction and…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Grammar
Jinshi Shao; Yuxi Wu; Simin Zeng; Rujing Huang – Language Learning Journal, 2024
The present study examined the relative effect of direct and indirect written corrective feedback (WCF) on L2 learning and the mediating role of language anxiety in the effectiveness of these two types of WCF. Forty-five Chinese L2 learners of English were randomly assigned to three experimental conditions: direct WCF (n = 15), indirect WCF (n =…
Descriptors: English Language Learners, Foreign Countries, Anxiety, Feedback (Response)
Christina Torres; Elif Saribas – Higher Learning Research Communications, 2024
Objectives: The purpose of the study was to investigate how tutors approached second language (L2) errors when working with advanced graduate students in structured one-on-one feedback sessions. Method: The longitudinal, qualitative case study used data from immediate, retrospective tutor reflections and in-session interactions to follow two…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Writing Instruction, Feedback (Response), Advanced Students
Laia Canals; Gisela Granena; Yucel Yilmaz; Aleksandra Malicka – Language Teaching Research, 2025
This study investigated the relative effectiveness of immediate and delayed corrective feedback on the acquisition of -ing/-ed participial adjectives by Spanish English-as-a-foreign-language learners in video-based computer-mediated communication. Fifty-two participants took part in a communicative task in one of four groups (two experimental and…
Descriptors: Computer Mediated Communication, Video Technology, Feedback (Response), Instructional Effectiveness
Kim, YouJin; Choi, Bumyong; Yun, Hyunae; Kim, Binna; Choi, Sujeong – Language Teaching Research, 2022
Recently, there has been a shift in the perception of tasks. Tasks are no longer viewed as 'one-off' activities, and the importance of studying the role of task repetition has been increasingly addressed (Bygate, 2018). However, the way task repetition effects are mediated by other instructional conditions such as corrective feedback has not been…
Descriptors: Repetition, Synchronous Communication, Written Language, Error Correction
Karim Sadeghi; Maryam Esmaeeli – RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2024
Corrective feedback (CF) has long been a hot topic in language education circles and has received extensive research attention. However, there is still controversy over the effectiveness of CF use and error correction in language classes. To address this discrepancy, the current study probed the effectiveness of different CF types in improving…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Accuracy
Effects of Explicit Written Corrective Feedback on Subject-Verb Agreement among Kurdish EFL Students
Mahmood, Rizgar Qasim; Aziz, Muhammad Abdulwahab – Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 2023
The research on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing has garnered considerable attention over the years, particularly concerning the impact of corrective feedback (CF) on students' errors. However, in the context of Kurdish EFL students, this area of research has received limited attention, despite its potential to enhance their grammatical…
Descriptors: Direct Instruction, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Grant Eckstein; Ying Suet Michelle Lung; Natasha Gillette – TESL-EJ, 2025
Students are often encouraged to proofread their writing by reading it aloud. Presumably, this will allow writers to correct local errors. Yet even though this strategy may be effective for native speakers, there is little empirical evidence of its benefit among second language writers. Therefore, we wondered how many errors second language…
Descriptors: Proofreading, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Investigating Learner Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback in a Thai Higher Education Context
Jinowat, Nattwut; Wiboolyasarin, Watcharapol – TEFLIN Journal: A publication on the teaching and learning of English, 2022
The current study investigated EFL learners' preferences for written corrective feedback (WCF) and the rationale for their preferences. A mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data collection, was used to explore this phenomenon. The data were collected using an internet-based questionnaire and a semi-structured interview.…
Descriptors: Preferences, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Hyunjin Jinna Kim; Yue Li; Yong-Jik Lee – Language and Education, 2024
This exploratory study attempts to understand how bilingual instruction can be incorporated effectively in a non-English speaking higher education context by examining the effectiveness of bilingual Korean instruction for Chinese international students at a South Korean university. Using quantitative and qualitative data sources consisting of an…
Descriptors: Bilingual Education, Second Language Instruction, Foreign Students, College Students
Barrot, Jessie S. – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2023
Despite the building up of research on the adoption of automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems, the differential effects of automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) on errors with different severity levels and gains across writing tasks remain unclear. Thus, this study fills in the vacuum by examining how AWCF through Grammarly affects…
Descriptors: Automation, Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Bowles, Melissa A.; Gastañaga, Kacie – Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2022
This study compares the processing of three different types of written corrective feedback (WCF) by heritage language (HL), second language (L2), and third language (L3) learners who wrote and revised three short essays and received a different type of WCF for each essay (i.e., direct, coding, or underlining). Comparison of pre- and post-feedback…
Descriptors: Native Language, Second Language Learning, Cognitive Processes, Written Language